> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.atomicagi.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Pages

> Prioritize page-level SEO actions by impact, page value, and effort

<Frame>
  <img src="https://mintcdn.com/atomicai/66wBloPCX-icbC_a/images/data/opportunities/app-opportunities-pages-overview.png?fit=max&auto=format&n=66wBloPCX-icbC_a&q=85&s=42cca6b48b8a91414b7bf42a10e4cfeb" alt="Opportunities pages overview with cards and page table" width="1536" height="1024" data-path="images/data/opportunities/app-opportunities-pages-overview.png" />
</Frame>

Use this page to choose which URLs your team should work on first, then move straight into issue-level fixes.

<div className="atomic-info-callout">
  <p>
    <strong>Important:</strong> Prioritize by business impact, not by issue
    count alone.
  </p>
</div>

## Questions this page should answer

1. Which pages have the highest-value SEO opportunities right now?
2. Which page should we open first for issue details?
3. When should we click `Fix with AI` instead of handling manually?

## Before you analyze

* Keep the same project and time context you use across Opportunities.
* Start with `All impact levels`, then narrow only after you see the full pattern.
* Prioritize `Page value` and `Impact` together before assigning work.

## What this page gives you

* Workflow cards: `All items`, `Unresolved`, `In review`, `Resolved`.
* A page table with `Page value`, `Impact`, and an action button per row.
* One-click drill-down into issue details for a specific URL.
* A direct `Fix with AI` action when you want execution help fast.

## How to read the top cards

* `All items`: total opportunity count in scope.
* `Unresolved`: items that still need work.
* `In review`: items being validated.
* `Resolved`: items marked complete.

Use these as workflow status signals, then prioritize in the table below.

<div className="atomic-highlight-card">
  <p>
    <strong>Key signal:</strong> High page value with high impact should always
    outrank high issue count on low-value pages.
  </p>
</div>

## How these metrics are calculated (simple)

### Page value

Page value is a weighted score combining page business importance and performance potential.

### Impact

Impact is the estimated upside if that issue is resolved on the page (`Low`, `Medium`, `High`).

### Workflow status cards

Workflow status cards are counts of issue items by state (`All items`, `Unresolved`, `In review`, `Resolved`).

## Step 1: Start from the pages overview table

Use the table to pick one URL to open first.

* `Page value` tells you business importance.
* `Impact` tells you expected SEO upside.
* `Fix with AI` lets you jump directly to assisted execution for that row.

Start with rows where both `Page value` and `Impact` are high.

## Step 2: Open a page row to view issue-level details

Click a page to open its detail modal. This is where you see the exact issue, why it matters, and what to change.

<Frame>
  <img src="https://mintcdn.com/atomicai/66wBloPCX-icbC_a/images/data/opportunities/app-opportunities-pages-modal.png?fit=max&auto=format&n=66wBloPCX-icbC_a&q=85&s=09083db5e9fa65b18a60db0eff95b883" alt="Page opportunities modal with issue details, how-to-fix guidance, and action button" width="1536" height="1024" data-path="images/data/opportunities/app-opportunities-pages-modal.png" />
</Frame>

Use this modal to:

* Validate the issue before assigning work.
* Read the built-in `How to fix` guidance.
* Decide if the fix should be manual or AI-assisted.

## Step 3: Click `Fix with AI` to generate execution help

After you click `Fix with AI`, the assistant opens with the selected URL and issue context already loaded.

<Frame>
  <img src="https://mintcdn.com/atomicai/66wBloPCX-icbC_a/images/data/opportunities/opportunities-fix-with-ai.png?fit=max&auto=format&n=66wBloPCX-icbC_a&q=85&s=5a8b6328aadcbddf6a13466eac71cb9d" alt="Opportunities pages with Fix with AI flow open in the assistant panel" width="1508" height="859" data-path="images/data/opportunities/opportunities-fix-with-ai.png" />
</Frame>

Use `Fix with AI` when:

* The issue is clear and you need a fast first draft.
* You are handling repetitive fixes across many pages.
* You want consistent fix output for your team.

## Quick weekly checklist

1. Review high-value, high-impact rows first.
2. Open each top row and validate issue details in the modal.
3. Assign owner and due date per selected URL.
4. Use `Fix with AI` for repetitive or high-volume fixes.
5. Track unresolved-to-resolved movement weekly.

## How to use filters

* `Impact = High`
  Build a focused queue for this sprint.
* `Page = specific URL`
  Run a full issue check for one key page before publishing.

Start broad, then narrow once owners and priorities are clear.

## What to fix first

| Pattern in page table                 | What it usually means                          | Recommended action                        |
| ------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------- |
| High page value + high impact         | Strong upside with clear business relevance    | Prioritize this sprint                    |
| Many issues on one important page     | One URL has stacked blockers                   | Bundle into one focused update cycle      |
| High impact but lower page value      | SEO upside exists but business return is lower | Schedule after core business pages        |
| Low impact on low-value pages         | Limited near-term return                       | Defer unless needed for technical hygiene |
| Same issues stay unresolved each week | Work is not getting completed or validated     | Assign ownership and add weekly follow-up |

## Team routine

1. Weekly: pick priority URLs and assign work.
2. Bi-weekly: validate completed fixes and status movement.
3. Monthly: rebalance page priorities by business value and results.
4. Quarterly: remove recurring patterns with systemic fixes.

## Keep in mind

* Opportunity count alone is not priority; always pair with value and impact.
* AI suggestions still need human review before publishing.
* Very short windows can overreact to normal URL-level volatility.

## Where to go next

* [Opportunities groups](/data/opportunities/groups): prioritize by issue type and theme
* [Technical overview](/data/technical/overview): validate technical blockers behind page issues
* [Google Search landing pages](/data/google-search/landing-pages): compare opportunity priority with traffic behavior
