Skip to main content
AI Search Competitors page with trend chart and competitor benchmark table
Use this page to compare your performance against direct competitors in one place.

Important: Compare the same prompt set and date range before declaring a competitor win/loss.

Questions this page should answer

  1. Which competitors are strongest on our tracked prompts?
  2. Where are we losing on visibility, position, or citations?
  3. Which competitive gap is most recoverable this sprint?

Before you analyze

  • Keep the same date range as Visibility.
  • Start with broad prompt and platform scope.
  • Focus on repeated movement, not one-day spikes.

What this page gives you

  • Trend comparison between your brand and competitors.
  • Table with Visibility %, AVG position, and Citations.
  • Fast prioritization of threats and opportunities.

How to read this page correctly

  • Visibility %: share of appearance in tracked AI answers.
  • AVG position: average placement quality.
  • Citations: source-backed presence strength.

Key signal: A competitor with lower visibility but stronger citations can still become a near-term threat because trust signals are improving faster.

How these metrics are calculated (simple)

Visibility %

Visibility % = (Responses where brand appears / total evaluated responses) x 100

AVG position

AVG position = Sum of answer placement indexes / Number of responses where that brand appears
Lower value is better.

Citations

Citations are the total source references attributed to that brand/domain in evaluated responses.

Quick weekly checklist

  1. Compare your brand with top 3 competitors.
  2. Flag one competitor gaining fastest.
  3. Identify one gap you can close in 1-2 sprints.
  4. Assign actions to prompts and pages.

How to use filters

  • Prompt scope: isolate the commercial topic you care about.
  • Platform scope: find engine-specific competitive pressure.
  • Date range: validate whether movement is persistent.

What to fix first

Pattern in Competitors dataWhat it usually meansRecommended action
Competitor visibility risingBetter answer relevanceImprove topical depth and prompt alignment
Competitor citations much strongerBetter trust footprintIncrease authority sources and proof quality
You lead visibility, lag on outcomesPost-click weaknessImprove destination pages and conversion clarity
Losses concentrated on one platformPlatform-specific gapAdapt content structure for that platform behavior

Team routine

  1. Weekly: review top movers.
  2. Bi-weekly: run one targeted recovery sprint.
  3. Monthly: report share movement versus top competitors.

Keep in mind

  • Competitive sets evolve with prompt mix.
  • Share gains without citation support are fragile.
  • Short reaction cycles outperform quarterly-only reviews.

Where to go next